
As a student at small college in the midwest, I don't hear of protests often (nor do I experience protests). Regardless, California students seems to be all about protesting this week. I learned one thing out of these events: a lesson in economics and strategic methods for change.
One
student protest was against a clothing manufacturer which fired over one hundred workers after the workers unionized. The protesters were members of an anti-sweatshop movement with organized groups at colleges/universities across the nation. It seems this happened because students convinced their administrations to end or suspend agreements with the company. It needed the college market.
The
other protest was against a decision to raise tuition at University of California schools. As a student whose tuition has increased $ 2,000 every year for three consecutive years, I empathize with the students. But somehow, financial aid and scholarships absorbed the extra tuition (for unexplained reasons the college somehow had enough money to increase financial aid, but needed to increase tuition). The real problem seems to be cuts in state funding for the university...maybe the students should be protesting the state budget. (
nyt article)
Students protesting tuition hikes could learn from the students protesting sweatshop labor. Be strategic. But they did get plenty of publicity due to the protests!